Image Formats Explained: PNG vs JPG vs WebP vs GIF

Understanding the differences between image formats and when to use each one for optimal results.

Choosing the right image format can dramatically impact your website's performance, image quality, and user experience. With so many options available—PNG, JPG, WebP, GIF, and more—it's crucial to understand when to use each format for optimal results. For comprehensive performance optimization strategies, check out our guide on how to optimize images for web performance.

In this comprehensive guide, we'll break down the most popular image formats, their strengths and weaknesses, and provide clear recommendations for different use cases.

JPG (JPEG) - The Universal Standard

JPG uses lossy compression, which means it reduces file size by permanently removing some image data. This makes it excellent for photographs where slight quality loss is acceptable in exchange for much smaller file sizes.

Best for: Photographs, complex images with many colors, images where file size is more important than perfect quality.

Pros: Small file sizes, universal browser support, good for photographs with gradual color transitions.

Cons: Lossy compression, no transparency support, quality degrades with each edit and save.

PNG - The Quality Champion

PNG uses lossless compression, preserving every pixel of the original image. It supports transparency and is ideal when image quality is paramount. PNG comes in two variants: PNG-8 (256 colors) and PNG-24 (millions of colors).

Best for: Images with transparency, logos, graphics with sharp edges, screenshots, images requiring perfect quality.

Pros: Lossless compression, transparency support, excellent for graphics and logos, no quality loss on re-saving.

Cons: Larger file sizes than JPG, not ideal for photographs with many colors.

WebP - The Modern Optimizer

Developed by Google, WebP provides superior compression compared to both JPG and PNG while maintaining excellent quality. It supports both lossy and lossless compression, as well as transparency and animation.

Best for: Web images where you want the best balance of quality and file size, modern websites targeting current browsers.

Pros: 25-35% smaller than JPG, 26% smaller than PNG, supports transparency and animation, both lossy and lossless compression.

Cons: Limited support in older browsers (though 95%+ modern browser support), not widely supported by image editing software.

To learn more about why WebP should be your go-to format for modern websites, read our detailed analysis: Why You Should Convert Your Images to WebP Format .

GIF - The Animation Specialist

GIF is limited to 256 colors but supports animation and transparency. While it's largely been superseded by better formats for static images, it remains popular for simple animations and memes.

Best for: Simple animations, images with very few colors (under 256), small icons and graphics.

Pros: Animation support, universal browser support, small file sizes for simple graphics, transparency support.

Cons: Limited to 256 colors, larger file sizes for complex images, poor compression for photographs.

Quick Decision Guide

Choose your format:

  • Photographs for web: JPG (or WebP if browser support allows)
  • Logos and graphics: PNG or SVG
  • Images with transparency: PNG or WebP
  • Simple animations: GIF or WebP
  • Maximum compression: WebP
  • Maximum compatibility: JPG or PNG

File Size Comparison

Here's a typical file size comparison for the same image in different formats:

Example: High-quality photograph (1920x1080)

  • PNG: 2.8 MB
  • JPG (90% quality): 850 KB
  • WebP (90% quality): 620 KB
  • WebP (lossless): 1.9 MB

Emerging Formats

AVIF: The newest format offering even better compression than WebP, but with limited browser support. Great for future-proofing.

HEIF/HEIC: Apple's format used in iOS, offering excellent compression but limited web support.

Best Practices

1. Use responsive images: Serve different formats based on browser support using the picture element.

2. Optimize for your audience: Consider your users' browsers and connection speeds.

3. Test compression levels: Find the sweet spot between quality and file size.

4. Consider lazy loading: Load images only when needed to improve page speed.

Ready to convert your images? Try our free online converter to experiment with different formats and see the quality and size differences for yourself. Our comprehensive converter guide explains how to use our browser-based tool with complete privacy and no file uploads: